By Rachel Ainsworth.

In our recent survey of marketing and thought leadership professionals, we asked about the biggest challenges organisations face when it comes to producing an appropriate volume of high-quality thought leadership. When nearly 90% of respondents placed “measuring ROI” in their top three, we weren’t surprised. Many of our clients have shared with us their challenges around deciding what to measure, and then—in the complex real world—actually doing the measuring.

This is not a debate confined to the B2B environment. Altimeter in The 2016 state of digital content highlights the same conundrum and presents data from a survey of over 500 content strategists across an array of industry verticals:

In our experience, many consulting firms are prioritising the same metric as 37% of these B2C companies: Reach. Yet this is often not overly helpful. You may reach two million people but if those people are never likely to be in a position to buy consulting services that reach is of little value. Reach can be impressive, but ROI low.

And again mirroring Altimeter’s data, the metric that often appears low on the list for many consulting firms, if tracked at all, is Conversion. That’s probably because it’s really difficult to track sales back to content, particularly when so many other factors and so many other interactions are influencing the outcome. And it seems to be an even greater challenge for larger firms where the complexity of interactions is so much higher.

Unfortunately there’s no “do this and all will be sorted” set of instructions. But we do have a few words of advice: The teams we’ve seen generate a high ROI have always been very clear at the outset who specifically they wish to target, and what success looks like (e.g., a list of meetings they wish to set up on the back of a piece of content). If you know what you’re aiming for it is so much easier to create the relevant content and optimise distribution, and to then track—as best you can—how successful you have been against those objectives. It sounds very obvious, but we have lost count of the number of times we have asked “What are your goals for this piece?” and not received a cogent, let alone compelling, answer.

*The full report Unleashing the value of thought leadership is available to firms subscribing to our White Space service. For more information, please contact Jo Peck.

 

Blog categories: 

Comments

Assuming there's a clear and tactical commercial purpose for the thought leadership (get X meetings or Y event attendees), it's easier than ever to measure leads, and it's not rocket science. For example, always use one primary contact name for phone responses. This channels enquiries to that individual, who can be briefed by marketing to capture leads and ask the all-important question 'How did you hear about this?' Similarly, use unique email, phone numbers and URLs for each piece of thought leadership. By doing so, you can easily isolate the source of the enquiry and prove conclusively which pieces of collateral are working the hardest. If the goal is more strategic 'issue ownership' - which, if you think about it, is the higher purpose behind a lot of thought leadership activities, then you must begin with thorough research. You have to understand if there are competitors already actively discussing the issue you want to own, and what they are saying. If there’s no gap to be exploited, or a position you can easily adopt that provides a client-compelling counter narrative, then you will struggle. All of the above takes careful planning to do effectively, although I suspect many marketing teams are simply told by the fee earners ‘we need this, and we need it tomorrow!’ It would certainly explain why most of what is touted as thought leadership in consulting is, in truth, followership.

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The validation is not case sensitive.
9 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.