Jump to navigation

Home
Login/Register
  • What we do
  • Who we are
  • Insights
  • Reports
  • White Space
  • Global Data Model
  • Emerging Trends
  • My account
 
 
 

Fiona Czerniawska

The year of “udsyn”

Alison Huntington

Who’s up and who’s down in the digital transformation war

Source EU

Brexit diary

Our directors are writing a series of blog posts about the UK public's choice to leave the EU

Read more


  

Should we be so hung up on recommendations?

Monday 2nd Oct, 2017

By Alison Huntington.

Passing through Heathrow Terminal 3 recently, I was accosted by a woman with an iPad who wanted to ask me a few questions about my experience at Heathrow that day. Being British, and therefore socially awkward, instead of telling her I’d really rather read my newspaper, I said “Yes, of course.”

Among the pretty mundane questions she went on to ask me was one about whether I’d recommend Terminal 3. 

“Erm, yes, I suppose,” came my response, with half an ear on the tannoy announcements. 

“How likely? Nine out of ten?”

“Er, yes, OK.” 

Thinking about it afterwards, I wondered how useful this data really was. Heathrow Terminal 3 was clean, with clear signage, and I got to my plane on time. But it wasn’t really any different from my experience at Terminal 5, or Gatwick, or JFK. And I certainly haven’t rung up any pals since, telling them: “Change your flights! You simply must experience Terminal 3 to believe it!”

It reminded me of something we’ve seen in the data we’ve gathered over the last couple of years about clients’ perceptions of consulting firms. Clients are consistently more willing to recommend a consulting firm than they are to say the quality of its work is high, or that it adds value worth more than the fees it charges. In total, 89% of clients say they either have recommended a firm, or would be willing to do so. That’s far higher than any positive perception about quality of work or value added. As a result, we often find ourselves scratching our heads, wondering why so many clients are willing to recommend firms that they don’t appear to be hugely impressed with.

 

I think my Heathrow experience has something to do with it. 

When asked a precise question (“How good is firm X at business strategy?”) a client is asked to think about something specific. It requires them to cast their mind back, and make an estimation of that particular thing. An equivalent for Heathrow would be, “How clean is the airport today?”; to which my answer would have been “Pretty clean, although the table in Wetherspoons was a bit sticky.”

But being asked whether you have or would recommend a firm puts a client on the spot—much like I was at Heathrow—to weigh up all their experiences with that firm and respond in a simplistic, binary manner. Basically, are they alright or not?

Of course, there’s a difference between a client going out on a limb to recommend a firm to the board, putting their personal reputation at stake by doing so, and saying they’d recommend a firm in an anonymous survey. But, overall, I wonder if firms get too hung up on this sort of data. Basically, Heathrow Terminal 3 did the job. And basically, all that this recommendation data tells us is that most consulting firms do, too. 

Blog categories: 
Client behaviour

Comments

Brad Smith replied on Tue, 2017-10-03 14:21 Permalink

Terminal 3

This is a hugely important point Alison has made. Besides a solid (though likely unintentional) dig at the growing number of peer review platforms that are tied to how analyst firms rate products and services, it gets at what we should and should not take from the volumes of contradictory data out there. Most survey data doesn't stand on its own. We must apply a layer of wisdom, experience and skepticism to tell a story that approximates reality.
  • reply

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The validation is not case sensitive.
3 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Related reports

  • [0,0,null]
    Perceptions of Consulting in the US in 2017
    March 2017
  • [0,0,null]
    Perceptions of Consulting in the UK in 2017
    March 2017

Share this article

Twitter icon
Facebook icon
LinkedIn icon
e-mail icon

Subscribe to our content

Subscribe to Source Global Research blog
Subscribe

Categories


  • All items

  • Market conditions
  • Business model
  • Client behaviour
  • Client-consultant relationship
  • Strategic planning
  • Marketing
  • Thought leadership
  • Strategy consulting
  • Big Four firms
  • Brand
  • For your amusement
  • Technology consulting
  • Quality and value
  • Pricing
  • Management thinking
  • Procurement
  • Innovation
  • Growth
  • Digital
  • Skills and development
  • Consulting in the GCC
  • Instinct
  • Specialist firms
  • Recession
  • Financial services consulting
  • HR consulting
  • Public sector consulting
  • Talent
  • IT consulting
  • Brexit Diary
  • Risk
  • Advice vs implementation
  • Internal consultants
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Globalisation
  • Tax
  • What we do
  • Who we are
  • Insights
  • Reports
  • White Space
  • Global Data Model
  • Emerging Trends
  • My account
  • Login
  • Create a new account
  • Reset your password

© 2009 - 2025 Source Information Services Ltd | Registration No: 06439935
Terms and conditions of use | Privacy policy

    • What we do
    • Who we are
    • Insights
    • Reports
    • White Space
    • Global Data Model
    • Emerging Trends
    • My account
    • Contact
      Contact us

      If you'd like to hear more about how we can help, call us on:
      +44 (0)20 3478 1204
      +1 (0)800 767 8058
      or email us here.

      Become one of us

      We’re always on the lookout for bright and enthusiastic people who would like to join us in our adventure.
      Interested?
      View our careers page here

      Head office address

      20 Little Britain
      London EC1A 7DH
      United Kingdom